Am I to understand then that the WTBS is ok with porn as long as its not damaging to the marriage? Wow, that's pretty enlightened thinking for that bunch.
Makes sense though considering they have equity holdings in PornHub.
Big Dog
JoinedPosts by Big Dog
-
27
Pornography in the Marriage
by LostintheFog1999 inthe magazine that they are studying in the congregation this month has an article at the back about how pornography in a marriage could damage the relationship.. there's one piece of advice that sounds rather scary, the wt suggests that the couple should "consider asking an elder with whom you are both comfortable to sit in and guide your discussions for a time.".
how many of you would want an elder present in your home while you and your partner discussed your personal sexual cravings and the type of porn videos being watched?.
-
-
-
77
What's next?
by lastmanstanding inwhat's next for the world?
a year ago i edited a map of the world to include some big arrows to tell the story of what is to come.
and i shared that map with various friends.
-
-
Big Dog
Makes me think of a line from a Stephen King novella "Queer weather. Coupled with the grueling winter we had come through and the late spring, some people had dragged out that old chestnut about the long-range results of the fifties A-bomb tests again. That, and of course, the end of the world. The oldest chestnut of them all."
-
-
-
Big Dog
These kinds of acts are beyond the pale. The people who commit atrocities like this forfeit all claim of humanity.
-
20
Noah + new understanding
by dothemath inso they mentioned noah couldn’t have preached to all the population back before the flood.
do you think they might start using common sense regarding not being able to get every animal type on the ark from the whole world?.
maybe the poor sloth from south america didn’t have to crawl all the way?
-
-
Big Dog
Oh the poor fundamentalists, even most of the mainstream churches view the first eleven chapters of Genesis as creation for dummies rather than historical narrative.
As I mentioned in another thread the flood account was one of the first issues I had with the theology I was being indoctrinated with as a child. Too many things about that story made no sense even to a middle school aged mind.
If you are going to argue for the existence of God, the flood account is not the hill to plant your flag on, or young earth, or any of the other stories in Genesis.
-
81
My conclusion on the matter
by ExBethelitenowPIMA inafter being brought up a jw, going to mts, bethel, pioneer school multiple times, serving in foreign assignments and having been an elder for decades my conclusion is that i am now pima, physically in mentally agnostic.. agnostic means you think it can’t be proven either way creation or evolution.
i do tend to lean towards evolution but creation at the very start because you can’t get life from dead matter.
but i’m open to the possibility of chance theory at the origin of it all.
-
-
Big Dog
As a side note ExBethel, you may want to watch some of the debates between John Lennox and Richard Dawkins, not just for content but as a nice example of how civilized discourse and debate is done. Their debates are definitely germane to the topic(s) of this thread.
-
81
My conclusion on the matter
by ExBethelitenowPIMA inafter being brought up a jw, going to mts, bethel, pioneer school multiple times, serving in foreign assignments and having been an elder for decades my conclusion is that i am now pima, physically in mentally agnostic.. agnostic means you think it can’t be proven either way creation or evolution.
i do tend to lean towards evolution but creation at the very start because you can’t get life from dead matter.
but i’m open to the possibility of chance theory at the origin of it all.
-
-
Big Dog
I have to agree with Cofty on this point. That's a membership in a club whose annual dues are far too high. You can find that sort of camaraderie and brotherhood in far more healthy environments. I've often felt that people that stay in when they are as you describe are more akin to someone displaying battered spouse syndrome. They have been abused for so long they begin to think they deserve it and can't imagine breaking away from their oppressor.
-
3
Dan Brown to George Orwell. What would you do?
by Slidin Fast inan artis in the uk pulped 6800 copies of the da vinci code, reconstituted the paper, and reprinted as 1984 by orwell as above.
i for one applaud the idea.
what use for the publications would you find?.
-
-
Big Dog
Toilet paper
-
13
Confirmation that religion is dying.
by Phizzy inthis is from a site called "atheist republic" :.
" the phenomenon of "nones" — individuals who claim no religious affiliation — is rapidly reshaping america's religious landscape.
recent surveys by the associated press-norc center for public affairs research indicate that 30% of u.s. adults identify as nonreligious.
-
-
Big Dog
I think many of the nones simply don't think about it most of the time and only when questioned do they have to think about how they identify. Secularism has been on the rise for decades and with the rollback of religious themed activities in the schools and in popular culture it just isn't on most people's screen on a daily basis. Most are thinking about work, kids, bills, vacations, etc and religion or spirituality isn't even an afterthought.
I was talking to a young boy a couple of houses down and he had no idea what Easter was. I asked if they did anything in school for easter and he said no. His parents don't go to any church but have said they are believers. Religion, at least here in the states, has just largely fallen out of the general consciousness of the populace, especially those under say 30.
-
81
My conclusion on the matter
by ExBethelitenowPIMA inafter being brought up a jw, going to mts, bethel, pioneer school multiple times, serving in foreign assignments and having been an elder for decades my conclusion is that i am now pima, physically in mentally agnostic.. agnostic means you think it can’t be proven either way creation or evolution.
i do tend to lean towards evolution but creation at the very start because you can’t get life from dead matter.
but i’m open to the possibility of chance theory at the origin of it all.
-
-
Big Dog
I can't say that I have had your experience with Ex-B so I can't speak to that.
I guess I just try to remember where we all came from and really try to have patience as much as possible but I agree, there are limits.
Even though I left home as soon as I could and attended college it still amazed me at how long it took me to deprogram myself completely. Some people never get there.
I would say at this point maybe a policy of not engaging and moving on to more rewarding discussions might be in order.
-
81
My conclusion on the matter
by ExBethelitenowPIMA inafter being brought up a jw, going to mts, bethel, pioneer school multiple times, serving in foreign assignments and having been an elder for decades my conclusion is that i am now pima, physically in mentally agnostic.. agnostic means you think it can’t be proven either way creation or evolution.
i do tend to lean towards evolution but creation at the very start because you can’t get life from dead matter.
but i’m open to the possibility of chance theory at the origin of it all.
-
-
Big Dog
I wasn't applying the monkey typewriter quote to natural selection, if I was unclear about that it's because this is a forum, not a peer reviewed paper I am working on to submit for publication. I take some liberties with my review of what I write. I was speaking in general terms of the universe itself and all of the incredible chain of events that had to occur from the big bang to arrive at me sitting here typing away if there was no supernatural component. The quote was aimed at why isn't that (fill in the blank) possible?
If we are talking about the natural selection portion of evolution then no, natural selection is not random. However, if we are discussing evolution in general, my understanding, and I'm sure you'll correct me if I'm wrong is that evolution has at least three distinct parts. First you have the generation of mutations which is thought to be a random process with some qualifications. The next part is random drift, more or less a roll of the dice that decides which changes are kept and which are lost. This is caused by accidental or environmental events and many mutations are lost. The random effects of drift can overwhelm natural selection in small breeding populations and many mutations are discarded. The third part, natural selection, preserves the beneficial changes and mutations and is not random.
Evolutionary theory is certainly not my area of expertise, but I've had enough crossover in my education to understand the fundamentals that evolution is at least partially random, and the monkey typewriter quote would be applicable in part at least to the process.
I think it's wonderful that Ex-B has come far enough to at least ask some questions and draw some conclusions and exit a mind controlling cult. My word that's enough accomplishment that I want to throw a party. I would submit that at this point asking Ex-B if he is willing to examine any of his conclusions and be open to examining them would be the next step. Small steps sometimes are all we can manage after a life of indoctrination and misinformation. If he is not, then I would bid him a good day and wish him the best in the new clarity he has found.